Comment: Following my analysis done last term (https://joystream.notion.site/Traffic-analysis-2023-05-27-3f5fb9b19e1241c9a28b68bf23499dc3?pvs=4), I’m not planning to hire any regular workers until some specific need arises. I may consider hiring someone to help with monitoring DWG operations in next terms.
Regular workers salaries: 8 * 11,660 JOY = 93,280 JOY
Monitoring worker salary: 3,000 JOY
Lead salary: 41,040 JOY
Total spending: 137,320 JOY
Comment: Following council support for SWG proposal (https://pioneerapp.xyz/#/proposals/preview/342), this term I’ve planned to double regular and monitoring (not lead) worker salaries. Figures above already include this change. Like stated previously, this increase will make salaries more competitive and decrease the gap between regular workers and lead and council.
No. | Objectives | Status | Key Results | Term initiatives |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Introduce availability monitoring | In progress | 1) Develop additional monitoring for total node availability, including disabled buckets | 1.1) Continue writing a small tool to ping all the operators and collect statistics from QN |
1.2) Deploy the monitoring tool | ||||
2 | Improve logs collection setup | In progress | 1) Grant SWG access to Elasticsearch |