Intro

This part two aims at comparing result obtained in:

Joystream CDN performance - part 1

and verify its claims using data obtained via a ping script deployed across the globe.

Due to the low sample size for the user data benchmark it has been deemed necessary to compare results with a richer (but less geographically diverse) dataset coming from a ping script deployed in various locations across the globe. The data obtained through this “ping tool” is colloquially referred as synthetic data and the rationale behind this second report is:

<aside> 💡 if both the user data and the synthetic data confirm the same finding, then the information is considered accurate and action will be taken by the lead if necessary

</aside>

Ping tool analysis

Caveat: the result reported refer to the last 30 days measurement

This is our current traffic in the past 30 days:

Breakdown by top countries:

The cumulative traffic of the countries constitutes around 80% or more of the traffic for the continent

• Asia:
  • Bangladesh
  • Indonesia
  • India
• South America:
  • Venezuela
  • Argentina
  • Brazil
  • Colombia
• Europe
  • Finland
  • Russia
  • West Europe (Spain, France, Germany, Italy, UK…)
• North America:
  • US
  • Mexico

Node performance vs Geolocation

The following result were obtained by deploying a script that fetches image 1343 and video 552149 In particular every one hour the image is fetched 5 times and the video 1. The script has been deployed in the following region via google cloud scheduler and ohv